1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/betaflight/betaflight-configurator.git synced 2025-07-17 21:35:33 +03:00
Commit graph

13 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
jflyper
8ac29e0563 Workaround for H7 Rev.V weirdness on erase beyond 1MB
H743 Rev.V (probably other H7 Rev.Vs also) remains in dfuDNBUSY state after the specified delay time.

STM32CubeProgrammer deals with behavior with an undocumented procedure as follows.

  1. Issue DFU_CLRSTATUS, which ends up with (14,10) = (errUNKNOWN, dfuERROR)
  2. Issue another DFU_CLRSTATUS which delivers (0,2) = (OK, dfuIDLE)
  3. Treat the current erase successfully finished.

Here in this PR, we call clarStatus to get to the dfuIDLE state when dfuDNBUSY is detected after timeout.

---
Below is the complete description of the problem reported at ST community
(https://community.st.com/s/question/0D50X0000C0w7U9SQI/weird-stm32h743zi-revv-usb-dfu-erase-behavior-beyond-1mb-page-8)

Weird STM32H743ZI Rev.V USB DFU erase behavior beyond 1MB (sector 8)

Summary

I'm observing errors and what looks like a non-standard error recovery procedure for all sectors beyond 1MB (sectors 8 through 15) during sector erase on STM32H743ZI Rev.V (Nucleo-H743ZI2) under STM32CubeProgrammer.

Is this behavior documented anywhere?

Description

For sector erase start to sector 2 erase, a log from the STM32CubeProgrammer looks like this.

13:05:04:121 : Flash sector erase ...
13:05:04:121 : DFU status = 0
13:05:04:121 : DFU State = 9
13:05:04:121 : Status: 0, State: 9
13:05:04:121 : sending an abort request
13:05:04:122 : DFU status = 0
13:05:04:122 : DFU State = 2
13:05:04:122 : sending a page erase request @: 0x08000000
13:05:04:122 : data: 4100000008
13:05:05:025 : DFU status = 0
13:05:05:025 : DFU State = 4
13:05:05:026 : DFU status = 0
13:05:05:027 : DFU State = 5
13:05:05:027 : erasing sector 0000 @: 0x08000000 done
13:05:05:027 : DFU status = 0
13:05:05:027 : DFU State = 5
13:05:05:027 : Status: 0, State: 5
13:05:05:027 : sending a page erase request @: 0x08020000
13:05:05:027 : data: 4100000208
13:05:05:932 : DFU status = 0
13:05:05:932 : DFU State = 4
13:05:05:933 : DFU status = 0
13:05:05:934 : DFU State = 5
13:05:05:934 : erasing sector 0001 @: 0x08020000 done
13:05:05:935 : DFU status = 0
13:05:05:936 : DFU State = 5
13:05:05:936 : Status: 0, State: 5
...

I notice that sector erase requests are followed by what seems like a pair of GETSTATUS results, with (status, state) being (0, 4) and (0,5) and then declared as erase done.
States 4 and 5 are probably dfuDNBUSY and dfuDNLOAD-IDLE respectively.
All sectors within the first 1MB (sectors 0 through 7) behaves the same.

But for sectors beyond 1MB, it looks like this.

13:05:11:397 : DFU status = 0
13:05:11:397 : DFU State = 5
13:05:11:397 : Status: 0, State: 5
13:05:11:397 : sending a page erase request @: 0x08100000
13:05:11:397 : data: 4100001008
13:05:11:413 : DFU status = 0
13:05:11:413 : DFU State = 4
13:05:11:414 : DFU status = 0
13:05:11:414 : DFU State = 4
13:05:13:419 : sending a clear status request
13:05:13:421 : DFU status = 14
13:05:13:421 : DFU State = 10
13:05:13:421 : an error occured after sending the clear status request
13:05:13:421 : Status: errUNKNOWN, State: dfuERROR
13:05:13:421 : DFU status = 14
13:05:13:422 : DFU State = 10
13:05:13:422 : sending a clear status request
13:05:13:422 : DFU status = 0
13:05:13:422 : DFU State = 2
13:05:13:422 : DFU status = 0
13:05:13:422 : DFU State = 2
13:05:13:422 : erasing sector 0008 @: 0x08100000 done

Notice that GETSTATUS results are now (0,4) and (0,4), followed by CLEARSTATUS returning (14,10) which is attributed as dfuERROR, and then another CLEARSTATUS (may be two?) that returned (0,2). This particular sector erase process is treated as successful, but it looks like that the process has never confirmed the successful completion of the erase operation but forced clear an error caused by the preceding clear.

(status, state) in the process are probably:
(14, 10) = (errUNKNOWN, dfuERROR)
(0, 2) = (OK, dfuIDLE)

Btw, sector erase succeeds with (0,4) (0,5) on STM32H743ZI Rev.Y (Nucleo-H743ZI) for all sectors 0 through 15 under STM32CubeProgrammer.
2020-01-22 18:27:13 +09:00
Hydra
4ff2a116e3 Use strict operator when checking for flash pages to erase. 2019-08-11 12:35:23 +02:00
Hydra
5cd4b2ff0e Display error to user when HEX file is invalid.
In this case, it's invalid if the HEX file doesn't contain any data in
the address range of the chip to flash.
2019-08-09 13:15:57 +02:00
Hydra
2cfc173ee9 Support EXST flashing. 2019-08-09 13:14:35 +02:00
jflyper
f741f7c6d1 Force trim multi-bank option bytes to the first one 2019-07-09 20:49:08 +09:00
Miguel Angel Mulero Martinez
58657ac345 Refactor flashing progress bar code 2019-07-04 20:39:29 +02:00
Bruce Luckcuck
cc4406a748 Fix Firmware Flasher progress bar color indicators
There was previous logic in place to display a visual indicator for the status of the firmware flash using different colors for the progress bar. Unfortunately the logic was never working, or was broken at some point. The progress bar color would remain the default even if the flashing failed, making it difficult to recognize there was a problem.

Fixed to display the progress bar in green for success, red for failed, and blue for other "action required" types of failures. The logic was already there to try and display the red and blue indicators but they weren't working.
2019-04-14 20:04:02 -04:00
jflyper
27f363cc70 Amend stm32usbdfu.js for USB errors to console 2018-12-12 23:30:44 +09:00
jflyper
2c62a0dc9d Be aware of async nature of the procedure 2018-12-06 21:30:11 +09:00
jflyper
99ab8a945c Use wTransferSize from DFU functional descriptor for writing/reading 2018-12-06 15:28:59 +09:00
Miguel Angel Mulero Martinez
1de9efd590 i18n stm32 driver 2018-01-29 09:28:11 +01:00
Miguel Angel Mulero Martinez
0a71f1e559 Use i18next as i18n framework 2018-01-27 12:19:17 +01:00
Bas Delfos
24c81375a4 Move src files 2018-01-24 22:50:40 +01:00
Renamed from js/protocols/stm32usbdfu.js (Browse further)