Usually .cpp files are equipped with using namespace libcamera;
Hence, it is unnecessary mentioning the explicit namespace of
libcamera at certain places.
While at it, a small typo in a comment was noticed and fixed as
part of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Hirokazu Honda <hiroh@chromium.org>
If the camera devices does not support the MANUAL_SENSOR capabilities
there is no point in generating a request template for the Manual
capture use case.
This change fixes CTS tests
android.hardware.camera2.cts.CameraDeviceTest#testCameraDeviceManualTemplate
android.hardware.camera2.cts.NativeCameraDeviceTest#testCameraDeviceCreateCaptureRequest
For devices that do not support MANUAL_SENSOR capabilities.
Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Add a MaxLatency control, and plumb it into the HAL accordingly.
Bug: https://bugs.libcamera.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50
Signed-off-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Add skeletal still and manual request templates so that we can expand
them for FULL support.
Signed-off-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
We need to be able to add additional characteristics/request/result keys
into the corresponding list in the static metadata based on libcamera
camera capabilities. We also need to be able to easily check if the
lists have specific keys, for populating templates and result metadata.
Turn the characteristics, requests, and results keys vectors into sets,
and move them to member variables to achieve this.
Signed-off-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Add helpers for setting android metadata from libcamera controls.
There are two versions, for scalars and collections, both of which take
a default value to fill in the android control if the libcamera control
is not found. They both return the value that was set.
Signed-off-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Add the infrastructure for checking and reporting capabilities. Use
these capabilities to determine the hardware level as well.
Bug: https://bugs.libcamera.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55
Signed-off-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
The validation of RAW stream support is performed in two different
places:
- At initializeStreamConfigurations() time, by verifying that the
libcamera format associated with HAL_PIXEL_FORMAT_BLOB is a Raw format
and ensuring the Camera successfully validates it
- As initializeStaticMetadata() time by generating a CameraConfiguration
for the Raw stream role and ensuring it is a Raw format with a 16 bit
depth
The first check is used to build the list of supported Raw stream
resolutions. The latter is used to register the
ANDROID_REQUEST_AVAILABLE_CAPABILITIES_RAW capability.
As building the list of supported Raw streams doesn't serve any
purpose if the RAW capability is not registered, centralize the Raw
format support verification at initializeStreamConfigurations() time by
ensuring the supported format is a Raw one with a 16 bit depth.
Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Reviewed-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
The getYUVResolutions() and getRawResolutions() functions are called
from the initializeStreamConfigurations() function, which is called by
initialize().
Rationalize the function naming scheme by renaming the two functions to
initializeYUVResolutions() and initializeRawResolution().
Cosmetic change only.
Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Reviewed-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
When building the list of supported YUV streams in getYUVResolutions()
the CameraConfiguration provided by the caller as first parameters is used.
As the CameraConfiguration will be later actually applied to the Camera,
avoid any possible overlap of the configuration parameters by using a
throw-away CameraConfiguration generated for the Viewfinder stream role
in getYUVResolutions().
It's also nicer to avoid having two functions with a similar purpose
such as getYUVResolutions() and getRawResolutions() with different
parameter lists, as the presence of a CameraConfiguration as first
parameter might be confusing to the reader.
Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>
Move the functionality for the following components to the new
base support library:
- BoundMethod
- EventDispatcher
- EventDispatcherPoll
- Log
- Message
- Object
- Signal
- Semaphore
- Thread
- Timer
While it would be preferable to see these split to move one component
per commit, these components are all interdependent upon each other,
which leaves us with one big change performing the move for all of them.
Reviewed-by: Hirokazu Honda <hiroh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
The camera_device.cpp has grown a little too much, and it has quickly
become hard to maintain. Break out the handling of the static
information collected at camera initialization time to a new
CameraCapabilities class.
Break out from the camera_device.cpp file all the functions related to:
- Initialization of supported stream configurations
- Initialization of static metadata
- Initialization of request templates
Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Acked-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
Tested-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Hirokazu Honda <hiroh@chromium.org>
