libcamera/src/ipa/raspberrypi/controller/rpi/dpc.cpp
Naushir Patuck 2f46dec949 ipa: raspberrypi: Rename the controller namespace from Rpi to RpiController
This avoids a namespace clash with the RPi namespace used by the ipa and
pipeline handlers, and cleans up the syntax slightly.

There are no functional changes in this commit.

Signed-off-by: Naushir Patuck <naush@raspberrypi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
2020-09-29 12:35:17 +01:00

49 lines
1.1 KiB
C++

/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause */
/*
* Copyright (C) 2019, Raspberry Pi (Trading) Limited
*
* dpc.cpp - DPC (defective pixel correction) control algorithm
*/
#include "../logging.hpp"
#include "dpc.hpp"
using namespace RPiController;
// We use the lux status so that we can apply stronger settings in darkness (if
// necessary).
#define NAME "rpi.dpc"
Dpc::Dpc(Controller *controller)
: Algorithm(controller)
{
}
char const *Dpc::Name() const
{
return NAME;
}
void Dpc::Read(boost::property_tree::ptree const &params)
{
config_.strength = params.get<int>("strength", 1);
if (config_.strength < 0 || config_.strength > 2)
throw std::runtime_error("Dpc: bad strength value");
}
void Dpc::Prepare(Metadata *image_metadata)
{
DpcStatus dpc_status = {};
// Should we vary this with lux level or analogue gain? TBD.
dpc_status.strength = config_.strength;
RPI_LOG("Dpc: strength " << dpc_status.strength);
image_metadata->Set("dpc.status", dpc_status);
}
// Register algorithm with the system.
static Algorithm *Create(Controller *controller)
{
return (Algorithm *)new Dpc(controller);
}
static RegisterAlgorithm reg(NAME, &Create);