Source files in libcamera start by a comment block header, which
includes the file name and a one-line description of the file contents.
While the latter is useful to get a quick overview of the file contents
at a glance, the former is mostly a source of inconvenience. The name in
the comments can easily get out of sync with the file name when files
are renamed, and copy & paste during development have often lead to
incorrect names being used to start with.
Readers of the source code are expected to know which file they're
looking it. Drop the file name from the header comment block.
The change was generated with the following script:
----------------------------------------
dirs="include/libcamera src test utils"
declare -rA patterns=(
['c']=' \* '
['cpp']=' \* '
['h']=' \* '
['py']='# '
['sh']='# '
)
for ext in ${!patterns[@]} ; do
files=$(for dir in $dirs ; do find $dir -name "*.${ext}" ; done)
pattern=${patterns[${ext}]}
for file in $files ; do
name=$(basename ${file})
sed -i "s/^\(${pattern}\)${name} - /\1/" "$file"
done
done
----------------------------------------
This misses several files that are out of sync with the comment block
header. Those will be addressed separately and manually.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com>
The TimeoutHandler used in the test is destroyed from the main thread,
which is invalid for a thread-bound object bound to a different thread.
Fix it by destroying it with deleteLater().
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com>
Starting a timer from the wrong thread is expected to fail, and we test
this in the timer-thread unit test. This is however not something that a
caller is allowed to do, and libcamera will get assertion failures to
catch this invalid usage. The unit test will then fail.
To prepare for this, split the unit test in two, with a test that is
expected by meson to succeed, and one that is expected to fail. The
assertion will then cause an expected failure, making the test suite
succeed.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com>
